Handling requests - report
Your report
You can download this report as a Word document using the button on the top right corner of the page. The report contains a template for an action plan, which we suggest you complete. If you have an problem downloading the report into a word document please let us know.
You may find it easier to complete the report if you change the page orientation to landscape and turn on table gridlines (for more information, please see the help section of your word processing program).
Alternatively, we have created an Excel action plan template for you to complete. This consists of a list of the performance areas and a drop down menu where you can reflect the below ratings. We have added additional columns for you to populate that we think will help you make an actionable plan for improvement.
The action plan is intended to be a working document. It can be customised as appropriate for your public authority. If you:
- receive an unsatisfactory rating, you must put an action in place and prioritise it;
- receive an adequate rating, you should put an action in place to improve but this action should not be prioritised over actions relating to unsatisfactory ratings; and
- receive a good rating, you should review the area to understand if further improvements can be made or what is required to maintain this performance.
Try not to focus effort on resolving symptoms; tackling symptoms may only move the problem from one place to another. Instead, identify, and put actions in place to mitigate or remove the root causes of the issues.
When devising improvement actions, we recommend you involve decision makers and people who will implement the actions. Your action plan should be agreed at a sufficient level of seniority with assigned responsibility for its delivery.
Question 1: The public authority’s procedures for handling requests for information are...
Reason for rating | Root cause of issues or success | Action | Delivery owner | Due date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Question 2: The way in which the public authority enables requesters to make a request for information / internal review is...
Reason for rating | Root cause of issues or success | Action | Delivery owner | Due date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Question 3: The way in which the public authority establishes what information is being requested is...
Reason for rating | Root cause of issues or success | Action | Delivery owner | Due date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Question 4: The way in which the public authority establishes whether or not the requested information is held is...
Reason for rating | Root cause of issues or success | Action | Delivery owner | Due date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Question 5: The way in which the public authority consults with relevant parties about the request for information is...
Reason for rating | Root cause of issues or success | Action | Delivery owner | Due date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Question 6: The way in which the public authority learns from previous handling of requests is...
Reason for rating | Root cause of issues or success | Action | Delivery owner | Due date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Suggested actions
- Consider putting in place triggers to help recognise when a request is not clear and clarification is required.
- Review your mechanisms for consulting with relevant parties.
- Review procedures for receiving requests in light of changes in technology and methods of communication.
- Check what contingency plans you have in place if there is a spike in the number of requests received.
What next
You should monitor delivery of the action plan.
Once actions have been completed you could take the relevant module again to establish whether the actions have improved performance and review whether further action is needed to ensure continuous improvement.
We recommend that you share your report with relevant colleagues and other similar public authorities who may learn from it.
In the interests of openness and transparency, we recommend that you publish your action plan.
Thank you for using our FOI self-assessment toolkit. Please consider leaving feedback to help us improve the toolkit.