Estyn

The complainant requested information about an internal investigation following an inspection at a particular school. Estyn initially claimed that the information was exempt under sections 40 and 36. At the time of the internal review, Estyn maintained reliance on sections 40 and 36 and introduced reliance on sections 21 and 42. The Commissioner has investigated and finds that the exemption that should have been cited was section 40(5) and that Estyn should have neither confirmed nor denied whether it held the requested information. He requires no steps to be taken.