Skip to main content

Hart District Council

  • Date 24 April 2017
  • Sector Local government
  • Decision(s) FOI 1: Not upheld, FOI 1: Upheld, FOI 10: Not upheld, FOI 10: Upheld, FOI 17: Not upheld, FOI 17: Upheld

The complainant has requested information relating to Hart District Council’s outsourcing agreement with Everyone Active. The Commissioner’s decision is that Hart District Council has complied with its obligations under section 1(1)(a), 17(3) and 17(7)(b) of the FOIA but breached its obligation under 17(7)(a) of the FOIA. She has also decided that in some instances it complied with its obligations under sections 1(1)(b), 10(1), 17(1)(a), 17(1)(b) and 17(1)(c) of the FOIA but in other instances it breached those sections. She does not require the public authority to take any steps to ensure compliance with the legislation.