Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority
- Date 31 May 2024
- Sector Central government
- Decision(s) FOI 36(2)(b)(i): Partly upheld, FOI 36(2)(b)(ii): Partly upheld, FOI 36(2)(c): Upheld
The complainant has requested information relating to increased pay-offs for MPs. The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (“IPSA”) refused to provide the requested information, citing section 36(2)(b)(i), (ii) and 36(2)(c) (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner’s decision is that section 36(2)(b)(i) and (ii) are engaged but section 36(2)(c) isn’t. In relation to section 36(2)(b), the balance of the public interest lies in disclosing the majority of the information. The Commissioner requires the public authority to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: disclose the requested information, with all personal data redacted under section 40(2) (personal information) except the document titled ‘Annex 1 – Consultation responses. Consultation on boundary changes and support to MPs leaving Parliament – Summary of Online Survey and Email Consultation responses. Information Tribunal FT/EA/2024/0254 under appeal.