Oxford Direct Services Limited

The complainant requested correspondence sent by or to the People Advisor at Oxford Direct Services Limited (“ODSL”). ODSL disclosed some correspondence, but relied on section 40(2) of FOIA (third party personal information) to redact information from the correspondence. The complainant argues that ODSL has over-redacted the information it disclosed under section 40(2). The Commissioner’s decision is that ODSL has correctly relied on section 40(2) of FOIA to withhold the information. The Commissioner does not require further steps to be taken.