Skip to main content

Chief Constable Commissioner for the Metropolis (Metropolitan Police Service)

  • Date 18 May 2026
  • Sector Police and criminal justice
  • Decision(s) FOI 10: Upheld, FOI 12: Not upheld, FOI 16: Not upheld

The complainant has requested information about policing a particular demonstration from the Metropolitan Police Service (the “MPS”). The MPS refused to provide the requested information, citing section 12(1) (Cost of compliance exceeds appropriate limit) of FOIA.

The Commissioner’s decision is that the MPS was entitled to rely on section 12(1) of FOIA. He also finds that there was no failure to comply with section 16(1) (Advice and assistance) of FOIA, although it did breach section 10(1) in providing a late response. No steps are required.