Accountability Framework – demonstrate your data protection compliance
Introduction to the Accountability Framework
What's new?
Navigating the Accountability Framework
Leadership and oversight
Policies and procedures
Training and awareness
Individuals’ rights
Transparency
Records of processing and lawful basis
Contracts and data sharing
Risks and data protection impact assessments (DPIAs)
Records management and security
Breach response and monitoring
Case studies

Accountability Framework – demonstrate your data protection compliance

What is accountability?

Accountability is one of the key principles in data protection law – it makes you responsible for complying with the legislation and says that you must be able to demonstrate your compliance.

It’s a real opportunity to show that you set high standards for privacy and lead by example to promote a positive attitude to data protection across your organisation.

Accountability enables you to minimise the risks of what you do with personal data by putting in place appropriate and effective policies, procedures and measures. These must be proportionate to the risks, which can vary depending on the amount of data being handled or transferred, its sensitivity and the technology you use.

Regulators, business partners and individuals need to see that you are managing personal data risks if you want to secure their trust and confidence. This can enhance your reputation and give you a competitive edge, helping your business to thrive and grow.

For more information about accountability, please read our guidance on accountability and governance.

How can I use the framework?

The framework is an opportunity for you to assess your organisation’s accountability. Depending on your circumstances, you may use it in different ways. For example, you may want to:

The framework is divided into 10 categories, for example ‘Leadership and oversight’. Selecting a category will display our key expectations and a bullet-pointed list of ways you can meet our expectations. These are the most likely ways to meet our expectations, but they are not exhaustive. You may meet our expectations in slightly different or unique ways.

You can demonstrate the ways you are meeting our expectations with documentation, but accountability is also about what you actually do in practice so you should also review how effective the measures are.

Accountability is not about ticking boxes. While there are some accountability measures that you must take, such as conducting a data protection impact assessment for high-risk processing, there isn’t a ‘one size fits all’ approach.

You will need to consider your organisation and what you are doing with personal data in order to manage personal data risks appropriately. As a general rule, the greater the risk, the more robust and comprehensive the measures in place should be.

To help you assess, report and improve your data protection compliance, you can complete our accountability self-assessment.

You can also use our accountability tracker if you want to record more detail and create an action plan to track your progress over time.

Introduction to the Accountability Framework

Introduction to the Accountability Framework

At a glance

Accountability is one of the key principles in data protection law – it makes you responsible for complying with the legislation and says that you must be able to demonstrate your compliance.

The Accountability Framework can help any organisation, whether small or large, with their obligations.

The framework is divided into 10 categories and contains expectations and examples of how your organisation can demonstrate your accountability.

As a starting point, we’d advise reading the Guide to the UK GDPR section on accountability first.

Who can use the framework?

You will find the Accountability Framework useful if you are responsible for putting appropriate measures in place to make sure that your organisation complies with data protection. You could be senior management, the data protection officer (DPO) or have records management or information security responsibilities.

The Accountability Framework can help to support any organisation, whether small or large, with their obligations. The key is that the measures you put in place must be appropriate, risk-based and proportionate. This depends on your organisation and what you are doing with personal data.

If you work for a smaller organisation you will most likely benefit, in the first instance, from the resources available on our SME hub, in particular the Assessment for small business owners and sole traders, and our Data protection self-assessment toolkit which has been created with smaller organisations in mind.

What is the scope of the framework?

This framework supports the foundations of an effective privacy management programme. It is not exhaustive and does not replace the need for you to comply with all applicable aspects of data protection, exercise your own judgement, and use other relevant guidance and materials such as the Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

The framework is not sector-specific because we want it to be relevant to as broad an audience as possible. In time, we will include case studies to highlight practical experience across different sectors and differently sized organisations.

Take a self-assessment

The accountability self-assessment will help you to assess the extent to which your organisation is currently meeting the ICO’s expectations in relation to accountability. 

Use the Tracker

The accountability tracker is a tool to help you record detail and track your progress over time.

What's new?

We will update this page to highlight and link to all updates to the Accountability Framework. There will be an annual review of the content of the Framework to ensure its up-to-date. If you would like to feedback or suggest improvements to the Accountability Framework you can do so here.

July 2021

We have added a new navigation page, updated the Tracker and altered the layout of the Framework.

Navigating the Accountability Framework

 

Leadership and oversight

Transparency

 

""

You should consider:

You should consider:

""

 

Records management and security

Individuals’ rights

 

""

You should consider:

You should consider:

""

 

Contracts and data sharing

Records of processing and lawful basis

 

""

You should consider:

You should consider:

""

 

Training and awareness

Breach response and monitoring

 

""

You should consider:

You should consider:

""

Leadership and oversight

Why is this important?

A fundamental building block of accountability is strong leadership and oversight. This includes making sure that staff have clear responsibilities for data protection-related activities at a strategic and operational level. Some organisations legally require a DPO; but everyone must allocate sufficient resources and make sure that data protection is a shared responsibility, rather than solely the task of someone working directly in a data protection role. You make senior management and the board accountable, and they must lead by example to promote the organised, proactive and positive approach to data protection that underpins everything else.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Organisational structure

There is an organisational structure for managing data protection and information governance, which provides strong leadership and oversight, clear reporting lines and responsibilities, and effective information flows.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures? 

Whether to appoint a DPO

If it is necessary to appoint a DPO under Article 37 of the UK GDPR, your organisation makes sure that the DPO’s role is adequately supported and covers all the requirements and responsibilities.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Appropriate reporting

The DPO is independent and unbiased. They must report to the highest management level and staff must be clear about how to contact them.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Operational roles

Your organisation’s operational roles support the practical implementation of data protection and information governance.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Oversight groups

An oversight group provides direction and guidance across your organisation for data protection and information governance activities.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Operational group meetings

In your organisation, operational level groups meet to discuss and coordinate data protection and information governance activities.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Further reading

ICO guidance:

ICO interactive tool:

External guidance:

Policies and procedures

Why is this important?

Policies and procedures provide clarity and consistency, by communicating what people need to do and why. Policies can also communicate goals, values and a positive tone. Data protection law specifically requires you to put in place data protection policies where proportionate. What you have policies for and their level of detail varies, but effective data protection policies and procedures can help your organisation to take the practical steps to comply with your legal obligations.

At a glance - What we expect from you

Direction and support

Your organisation’s policies and procedures provide your staff with enough direction to understand their roles and responsibilities regarding data protection and information governance.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Review and approval

You have a review and approval process in place to make sure that policies and procedures are consistent and effective.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Staff awareness

Staff are fully aware of the data protection and information governance policies and procedures that are relevant to their role.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Data protection by design and by default

Your policies and procedures foster a ‘data protection by design and by default’ approach across your organisation.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Further reading

ICO guidance:

Further resources:

External guidance:

Training and awareness

Why is this important?

This makes sure that all employees receive appropriate training about your privacy programme, including what its goals are, what it requires people to do and what responsibilities they have. The training must be relevant, accurate and up to date. Training and awareness is key to actually putting into practice your policies, procedures and measures by:

At a glance – what we expect from you

All-staff training programme

You have an all-staff data protection and information governance training programme.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Induction and refresher training

Your training programme includes induction and refresher training for all staff on data protection and information governance.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Specialised roles

Specialised roles or functions with key data protection responsibilities (such as DPOs, subject access and records management teams) receive additional training and professional development beyond the basic level provided to all staff.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Monitoring

Your organisation can demonstrate that staff understand the training. You verify their understanding and monitor it appropriately eg through assessments or surveys.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Awareness raising

You regularly raise awareness across your organisation of data protection, information governance and associated policies and procedures in meetings or staff forums. You make it easy for staff to access relevant material.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Further reading

ICO guidance:

External guidance:

 

Individuals’ rights

Why is this important?

Data protection law aims to empower individuals and give them greater control over their personal data through several rights, which you need to facilitate effectively. Compliance with individual rights minimises the privacy risks to individuals as well as to organisations. It will help you to comply with other data protection requirements, such as the principles. Good data protection compliance enhances your reputation and gives you a competitive edge because it increases the trust and confidence that people have in how you handle personal data.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Informing individuals and identifying requests

You inform individuals about their rights and all staff are aware of how to identify and deal with both verbal and written requests.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Resources

You have appropriate resources in place to handle requests from individuals about their data.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Logging and tracking requests

Your organisation logs receipt of all verbal and written requests from individuals and updates the log to track the handling of each request.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Timely responses

You deal with requests from individuals in a timely manner that meets individual expectations and statutory timescales.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Monitoring and evaluating performance

Your organisation monitors how your staff handle requests and you use that information to make improvements.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Inaccurate or incomplete information

Your organisation has appropriate systems and procedures to change inaccurate information, add additional information to incomplete records or add a supplementary statement where necessary.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Erasure

You have appropriate methods and procedures in place within your organisation to delete, suppress or otherwise stop processing personal data if required.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Restriction

Your organisation has appropriate methods and procedures in place to restrict the processing of personal data if required.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Data portability

Individuals are able to move, copy or transfer their personal data from your organisation to another securely, without affecting the data.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Rights related to automated decision-making and profiling

Your organisation can protect individual rights related to automated decision-making and profiling, particularly where the processing is solely automated with legal or similarly significant effects.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Individual complaints

Your organisation has procedures to recognise and respond to individuals' complaints about data protection, and individuals are made aware of their right to complain. 

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Transparency

Why is this important?

Transparency is a key data protection principle which is fundamental to a ‘data protection by design and by default’ approach. It facilitates the exercise of individuals’ rights and gives people greater control. This is particularly important if the processing is complex or if it relates to a child. Proactively respecting people’s privacy can give you a competitive advantage by increasing the confidence of the public, regulators and business partners. Being open and honest about what you do with personal data will support contracting and data sharing with third parties.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Privacy notice content

Your organisation's privacy information or notice includes all the required information under Article 13 and 14 of the UK GDPR.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Timely privacy information

You have a recorded procedure to make sure that individuals receive privacy information at the right time, unless an exemption applies.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Effective privacy information

Your organisation provides privacy information that is:

  • concise;
  • transparent;
  • intelligible;
  • clear
  • in plain language; and
  • communicated in a way that is effective for the target audience.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Automated decision-making and profiling

Your organisation is transparent about any processing relating to automated decision-making and profiling.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Staff awareness

Your organisation can demonstrate that any member of front-line staff is able to explain the necessary privacy information to data subjects and provide guidance.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Privacy information review

Your organisation has procedures to review the privacy information provided to data subjects regularly to make sure that it is accurate, up to date and effective.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Tools supporting transparency and control

You are open about how you use personal data, and offer tools to support transparency and control, especially when processing children's personal data. 

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Records of processing and lawful basis

Why is this important?

It’s a legal requirement to document your processing activities. Taking stock of what information you have, where it is and what you do with it makes it much easier for you to improve your information governance and comply with other aspects of data protection law (such as creating a privacy notice and keeping personal data secure). It is a clear way to show what you are doing in line with the accountability principle and we may require you to provide these records to us. Your processing won’t be lawful without a valid lawful basis so you must justify your choice appropriately.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Data mapping

Your organisation frequently carries out comprehensive data mapping exercises, providing a clear understanding of what information is held and where.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Record of processing activities (ROPA)

Your organisation has a formal, documented, comprehensive and accurate ROPA based on a data mapping exercise that is reviewed regularly.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

ROPA requirements

Your ROPA contains all the relevant requirements set out in Article 30 of the UK GDPR.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Good practice for ROPAs

Your organisation’s ROPA includes links to other relevant documentation, such as contracts or records as a matter of good practice.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Documenting your lawful basis

You document and appropriately justify your organisation’s lawful basis for processing personal data in line with Article 6 of the UK GDPR (and Articles 9 and 10, if the processing involves special category or criminal offence data).

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Lawful basis transparency

You make information about the purpose of the processing and the lawful basis publicly available. This is easy to locate, access and read.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Consent requirements

If your organisation relies on consent for the processing of personal data, you comply with the UK GDPR’s consent requirements of being:

  • specific;
  • granular;
  • prominent;
  • opt-in;
  • documented; and
  • easily withdrawn.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Reviewing consent

You proactively review records of previously gathered consent, which demonstrates a commitment to confirming and refreshing the consents.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Risk-based age checks and parental or guardian consent

Your organisation has effective systems in place to conduct risk-based age checks and, where required, to obtain and record parental or guardian consent.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Legitimate interest assessment (LIA)

If your organisation’s lawful basis is legitimate interests, you have completed an appropriate LIA prior to starting the processing.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

 

 

Contracts and data sharing

Why is this important?

It is good practice for you to have written data sharing agreements when controllers share personal data. This helps everyone to understand the purpose for the sharing, what will happen at each stage and what responsibilities they have. It also helps you to demonstrate compliance in a clear and formal way. Similarly, written contracts help controllers and processors to demonstrate compliance and understand their obligations, responsibilities and liabilities.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Data sharing policies and procedures

Your organisation's policies and procedures make sure that you appropriately manage data sharing decisions.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Data sharing agreements

You arrange and regularly review data sharing agreements with parties with whom you regularly share personal data

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Restricted transfers

Your organisation has procedures in place to make sure that restricted transfers are made appropriately.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Processors

You have appropriate procedures in place regarding the work that processors do on your behalf.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Controller-processor contract requirements

All of your controller-processor contracts cover the terms and clauses necessary to comply with data protection law.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Processor due diligence checks

You carry out due diligence checks to guarantee that processors will implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to meet UK GDPR requirements.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Processor compliance reviews

Your organisation reviews data processors’ compliance with their contracts.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Third-party products and services

Your organisation considers ‘data protection by design’ when selecting services and products to use in data processing activities.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Purpose limitation

Your organisation proactively takes steps to only share necessary personal data with processors or other third parties.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Risks and data protection impact assessments (DPIAs)

Why is this important?

The need to identify, assess and manage privacy risks is an integral part of accountability. Understanding the risks of the way you use personal data specifically is central to creating an appropriate and proportionate privacy management framework. A DPIA is a key risk management tool, and an important part of integrating ‘data protection by design and by default’ across your organisation. It helps you to identify, record and minimise the data protection risks of projects. DPIAs are mandatory in some cases and there are specific legal requirements for content and process. If you cannot mitigate a high risk, you must have a process for reporting this to the ICO.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Identifying, recording and managing risks

Your organisation has appropriate policies, procedures and measures to identify, record and manage information risks.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Data protection by design and by default

You take a data protection by design and by default approach to managing risks, and, as appropriate, you build DPIA requirements into policies and procedures.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

DPIA policy and procedures

You understand whether a DPIA is required, or where it would be good practice to complete one. There is a clear DPIA policy and procedure.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

DPIA content

DPIAs always include the appropriate information and are comprehensively documented.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

DPIA risk mitigation and review

You take appropriate and effective action to mitigate or manage any risks a DPIA identifies, and you have a DPIA review process.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Further reading

ICO guidance:

External guidance:

Records management and security

Why is this important?

Good records management supports good data governance and data protection. Wider benefits include supporting information access, making sure that you can find information about past activities, and enabling the more effective use of resources. Some of the consequences of poor records management include poor decisions, failure to handle information securely and inefficiencies. Information security also supports good data governance, and is itself a legal data protection requirement. Poor information security leaves your systems and services at risk and may cause real harm and distress to individuals – it may even endanger lives in some extreme cases.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Creating, locating and retrieving records

You have minimum standards for the creation of records and effective mechanisms to locate and retrieve records.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Security for transfers

You have appropriate security measures in place to protect data that is in transit, data you receive or data you transfer to another organisation.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Data quality

You have procedures in place to make sure that records containing personal data are accurate, adequate and not excessive.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Retention schedule

You have an appropriate retention schedule outlining storage periods for all personal data, which you review regularly.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Destruction

You cover methods of destruction in a policy and they are appropriate to prevent disclosure of personal data prior to, during or after disposal.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Information asset register

You have an asset register that records assets, systems and applications used for processing or storing personal data across the organisation.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Rules for acceptable software use

You identify, document and implement rules for the acceptable use of software (systems or applications) processing or storing information.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Access control

You limit access to personal data to authorised staff only and regularly review users’ access rights.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Unauthorised access

You prevent unauthorised access to systems and applications, for example by passwords, technical vulnerability management and malware prevention tools.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Mobile devices, home or remote working and removable media

You have appropriate mechanisms in place to manage the security risks of using mobile devices, home or remote working and removable media.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Secure areas

You secure physical business locations to prevent unauthorised access, damage and interference to personal data.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Business continuity, disaster recovery and back-ups

You have plans to deal with serious disruption, and you back up key systems, applications and data to protect against loss of personal data.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Breach response and monitoring

Why is this important?

You need to be able to detect, investigate, risk-assess and record any breaches. You must report them as appropriate. Having effective processes in place helps you to do this. A personal data breach can have a range of adverse effects on individuals. There can be serious repercussions for organisations, their employees and customers, such as financial penalties (failure to notify a breach when required can result in a fine up to 10 million Euros or 2% of your global turnover), reputational damage, loss of business and disciplinary action.

At a glance – what we expect from you

Detecting, managing and recording incidents and breaches

You have procedures in place to make sure that you detect, manage and appropriately record personal data incidents and breaches. 

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Assessing and reporting breaches

You have procedures to assess all security incidents and then report relevant breaches to the ICO within the statutory time frame.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Notifying individuals

You have procedures to notify affected individuals where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Reviewing and monitoring

You review and monitor personal data breaches.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

External audit or compliance check

Your organisation arranges an external data protection and information governance audit or other compliance checking procedure.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Internal audit programme

If your organisation has an internal audit programme, it covers data protection and related information governance (for example security and records management) in sufficient detail.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Performance and compliance information

Your organisation has business targets relating to data protection compliance and information governance, and you can access the relevant information to assess against them

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Use of management information

All relevant management information and the outcomes of monitoring and review activity are communicated to relevant internal stakeholders, including senior management as appropriate. This information informs discussions and actions.

Ways to meet our expectations:

Have you considered the effectiveness of your accountability measures?

Further reading

ICO guidance:

External guidance:

Case studies

Latest update - 10 November 2023

10 November 2023 - We have added a new case study example to the ‘Case studies’ section of the Accountability Framework. This case study has been submitted by His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and concerns the accountability challenge of ‘Records management and security

Our Accountability Framework provides a number of examples of the different ways you can demonstrate your compliance with the accountability principle. To help you even further, we’ve worked with organisations to capture real-world examples and case studies of different approaches to accountability.

We’re always interested to hear from other organisations who have used the Accountability Framework. You can get in touch here.

Leadership and Oversight

Organisation: Macmillan Cancer Support

Role: Information governance and security

Accountability challenge: Roles and responsibilities

Macmillan’s purpose is to help people affected by cancer. Our staff are aware that an important part of this is to respect their privacy, freedoms, and preferences.

We built the Keeping Data Safe (KDS) framework as part of our information security management system (ISO 27001:2013) to minimise data protection risk. We put in place a clearly-defined accountability programme that protects the personal data we collect. It also ensures we use the data appropriately.  Our framework creates accountability by establishing clear roles and responsibilities using the following three groups:

  • Keeping Data Safe groups

Each directorate has a group which data owners, data managers and data protection leads attend. Each KDS group also has representation from Information Governance, Information Security, and Risk and Compliance. The group’s aim to review locally how we work with each other, our partners, and our customers. This supports Macmillan’s operational and strategic data protection and information security requirements at the directorate level.

  • Information governance group (IGG)

The IGG has operational responsibility with oversight and management over all information governance and information security plans and their delivery across Macmillan. The IGG aims to ensure that Macmillan effectively manages any risks or issues, including ones that the KDS groups identify.  This ensures that all operational functions are efficient and in line with Macmillan policies, procedures, legal obligations and best practice requirements.

  • Information governance board (IGB)

The IGB has strategic responsibility. It provides governance, decision-making and oversight of all information governance plans and activities within Macmillan. The IGB allocates proper resource to these activities and can initiate projects with budget allocation. The IGB reports to the Performance and Risk Board, and has access to Macmillan’s senior leadership. This makes sure that senior staff understand data protection and information security risks and can add momentum to decision making.

How have these groups worked for us?

These groups allow for upward and downward communication regarding information risk between the Keeping Data Safe groups, IGG and IGB. For example, we use these groups to communicate other accountability measures, such as our DPIA process and the integration with Microsoft Forms. We implemented our updated DPIA process in a short time frame, since the KDS groups meet every six weeks. All directorates across Macmillan have successfully adopted the new process. Communicating this new process through the KDS groups brought consistency in approach, application, and training, as all groups received the same messaging. The DPIA process has benefited from the KDS groups, as the groups provide a space where we can learn about impending projects coming through the DPIA process.

 

Organisation: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Leadership and oversight

Before implementing the Accountability Framework, we had difficulty involving the Senior Responsible Owners (SROs) directly. They were typically more senior than our data protection managers. Data protection managers found it difficult to attain the necessary momentum to implement data protection measures.

Using the Accountability Framework enabled us to make a hierarchical structure that works. We’ve explained to the SROs that they ‘own’ the residual data protection risk. We use the framework to highlight areas that need attention. This helped our SROs make informed decisions about resourcing when considering requirements from other business areas. This hierarchical structure with clear involvement from the SROs increased the number of colleagues with direct, reportable responsibility for data protection. It also provided an escalation route for me as the DPO.

Policies and Procedures

Organisation: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Policies and procedures

The Accountability Framework gave us the idea to add an ownership column to our policies. This created a more robust process for creating and reviewing policies. The ownership column allowed us to develop a two-tier approach.  In this approach, senior roles govern common business areas (eg security and finance) and we assign junior colleagues more specific tasks.

We also used the steps in the Accountability Framework to develop a better system for identifying where policies need improving. It also allows us to act efficiently by developing policies jointly across business areas or by having areas sign up to pre-existing policies.

 

Organisation: Newry Mourne and Down District Council

Accountability challenge: Policies and procedures

The UK GDPR coming into force gave us an opportunity to really ‘take stock’ of how we do data protection across our council. We planned a programme of work to improve our policies, procedures and training.

To help us to focus on what we needed to do, we started by conducting an audit. From this, we created short, medium and long term targets, which we aligned with the ICO’s accountability framework.

Our audit included reviewing existing relevant policies and procedures and making improvements to link them together. For example, we created:

  • an information strategy group with an overall vision aligned with the data principles;
  • a new process to investigate breach reports; and
  • a new retention and disposal schedule incorporating the ICO’s records management retention schedule guidance.

 

Organisation: The Office of Intercollegiate Services (OIS), University of Cambridge

The Office of Intercollegiate Services (OIS) was created by the 31 Colleges in the University of Cambridge to support their common activities and interests. Each College is a legal entity and registered data controller in its own right, and each is separate from the University.

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Consistent compliance reviews

In my role, I advise and support the colleges, each with their own operational and governance structures. It is challenging to help them review their data protection compliance consistently.

Over the years, I tried different approaches, including a granular self-assessment that was not widely used. I revised this in 2020 and created a new ‘toolkit’, using broader statements from the ICO’s online self-assessment. This was flexible enough for each college to take account of their own unique circumstances. For example, each college could describe their individual governance structure and the data protection impact assessments they carried out.

Crucially, I also explained the regulatory and business benefits of completing the compliance review. This increased engagement substantially, to an unprecedented 80% response rate.

I reviewed each college’s submission and produced individual summary reports. The reports included recommendations to help them improve and an overall accountability assurance rating.

Many of the colleges submitted the report to their governing bodies for formal approval. This allowed local data protection champions at the colleges to obtain the resources they needed to address any gaps identified through action plans. I could also now benchmark their compliance and track progress.

More recently, I adapted the ICO’s accountability framework tracker for my in-house toolkit. The dashboard is particularly useful for management reporting.

While the colleges already had some excellent practices in place, they are now in a better position. They can demonstrate their accountability, and their commitment to continuous improvement, in a clear and consistent way.

Training and Awareness

Organisation: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)

Role: Data Protection Officer

Accountability challenge: Advanced training

Staff from both the fraud teams and the wider DWP need to understand and apply the correct data protection regime . We wanted to have the correct training measures in place, such as guidance, so that our staff could identify which regime applied to their specific processing activities. To address this, we developed a tool which explained the practical implications of the differences between the two regimes. It also gave the criteria for determining which one applies.

A good deal of thought and preparation went into the development and delivery of the product. We wanted to make it practical and easy to understand so colleagues without a deep data protection knowledge could use it. We used the ICO guidance for the technical content and worked with business colleagues to tailor the material to the audience.

We showcased the new tool to over 900 staff and feedback was extremely positive. We gained feedback at the end of each presentation through the Microsoft Teams chat facility and also by issuing a feedback form. A large majority of attendees felt that the awareness sessions improved both their knowledge and overall confidence.

This work also led to further improvements to our guidance and products. We updated our guidance to clearly define the different regimes that could apply to DWP’s processing activities. We also identified additional products that needed further clarification. We have subsequently updated several products, including draft customer letters from within the Counter Fraud and Compliance Division and the right of access request internal guidance.

 

Organisation: Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)

Role: Group Manager, Information Management and Compliance

Accountability challenge: Communicating across different departments

I’m responsible for making sure that the ICO itself complies with the accountability principle. It is easy to forget that, as well as a regulator, the ICO is also a controller of personal data!

Despite my initial uncertainty, in reality, the accountability principle wasn’t so mysterious. I simply focused on the two key elements: to make sure that we have appropriate measures in place and that we can demonstrate what we do.

The ICO already had processes and teams in place to support accountability. However, the Accountability Framework presented a great opportunity to review our practices and think about where we might improve.

The Framework’s suite of tools made my job much easier, enabling me to identify priority areas and take steps to address them. Although it took time to complete this review, consulting with different departments, it was well worth the effort to get the results.

For example, to improve our cross-office engagement, we:

  • supported and followed up with departments about their processing. This helped us to get timely information about our processing and to put in place the necessary foundations for our accountability review;
  • put in place a clear, easy to use process for updating and signing off our privacy notice. This helps us be clear about responsibilities and to keep track of updates;
  • reviewed our systems and considered how we would demonstrate our accountability. We used a communications plan to highlight at the right time, to the right people, what information they needed to store and where; and
  • established a community of local information management officers who meet regularly. We use this feedback to make our processes easier for staff to understand and use.

 

Organisation: Newry Mourne and Down District Council

Accountability challenge: Training

The UK GDPR coming into force gave us an opportunity to really ‘take stock’ of how we do data protection across our council. We planned a programme of work to improve our policies, procedures and training.

We used the ICO’s training materials to give all staff and councillors face-to-face training and we also developed e-learning modules. We engage with external organisations and reflect on our experiences to help us continually improve. By adapting the ICO’s training materials rather than creating our own, we saved resources and money.

Transparency

Organisation: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Transparency

The Accountability Framework encouraged us to review the layout of our privacy notices and evaluate how our organisation interacts with our personal information charter. As a result, we are seeing an increase in staff members using our privacy notice. The data protection team are also using it as a reference point and guide when engaging with colleagues in other business areas.

Records of processing and lawful basis

Organisation: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Record of Processing Activities (ROPA) and lawful basis

Implementing the Accountability Framework highlighted that we were using different methods to complete the ROPA across our organisation. This meant we did not complete areas of the ROPA in line with best practice, and created inefficiencies. We developed a ‘house style’ of ROPA template that introduces more uniformity and makes it easier to produce training material and workshops on ROPA requirements. The uniformity allows us to embed a ‘DEFRA style’ approach to data protection. We use this to create communities of colleagues with common responsibilities. These communities are cost-effective for developing technical solutions to the assets they manage.

Risks and DPIAs

Organisation: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Risks and DPIAs

We previously used several different versions of the DPIA template. This created confusion when colleagues completed different templates. In particular, it was inefficient to review different templates and bring them all to the same standard. It was also difficult to provide training on how to complete a DPIA. The Accountability Framework helped us to demonstrate to the organisation the benefits of developing a single DPIA template, which we implemented. We used this template to create a self-service system, improving efficiency. In particular, colleagues now find it easier to familiarise themselves with our DPIA guidance and single DPIA template. As a result, we can see an improvement in the standard of DPIA completion. Staff find it easier to complete DPIAs without seeking advice from data protection colleagues.

DPIA completion is important as it helps to improve understanding of policies and projects. It also provides an opportunity for our data protection community to link up with policy colleagues in other areas of the business and share experiences.

 

Organisation: Macmillan Cancer Support

Role: Information governance and security

Accountability challenge: Risk management

Macmillan’s purpose is to help people affected by cancer. Our staff are aware that an important part of this is to respect their privacy, freedoms, and preferences.

We built the Keeping Data Safe (KDS) framework as part of our information security management system (ISO 27001:2013) to minimise data protection risk. We put in place a clearly-defined accountability programme that protects the personal data we collect. It also ensures we use the data appropriately. 

We used our Keeping Data Safe accountability framework to introduce standardised and measurable definitions of information risks. For example, terms like ‘impact’ and ‘likelihood’ have a set of defined criteria, which makes them easier to apply. This helped us to remove subjectivity in risk assessments, creating consistency across the directorates. This consistency helps us to identify high priority risks and allocate our resources accordingly. This also helps our organisation’s risk monitoring activities, as we can create actions and controls that are relevant and measurable now that we have clearly defined our information risks. 

Records management and security

Organisation: His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC)

Role: Data protection officer

Accountability challenge: Records management and security

We carried out a comprehensive Risk Discovery Programme within HMRC using the Accountability Framework and split category 9 of ‘Records management and security’ into two to bring greater focus to each topic. We separated categories 9.2, 9.7, 9.8, 9.10, 9.11 and 9.12 into a separate security topic.

We worked with business risk co-ordinators in all ten of our business groups to identify data protection risks using the topic-based approach. We delivered workshops based on ‘what good looks like’ from the Accountability Framework. This prompted effective conversations around how we are already meeting expectations in some areas and where we could improve compliance in others.

We engaged with central Security & Information Business Partner teams and other teams responsible for the creation of enterprise-wide policies to determine how many records management and security improvements could be delivered centrally.

Having completed the Risk Discovery Programme, we have identified the need to coordinate risk articulation and control design due to similar themes existing across business groups. We intend to continue using the ICO’s Accountability Framework to review progress over the coming months.